Messages to the Presidents of the World
|44th President of the United States|
|In office January 20, 2009 – January 20, 2017|
|Vice President||Joe Biden|
|Preceded by||George W. Bush|
|Succeeded by||Donald Trump|
|United States Senator from Illinois|
|In office January 3, 2005 – November 16, 2008|
|Preceded by||Peter Fitzgerald|
|Succeeded by||Roland Burris|
|Member of the Illinois Senate from the 13th district|
|In office January 8, 1997 – November 4, 2004|
|Preceded by||Alice Palmer|
|Succeeded by||Kwame Raoul|
|Born||Barack Hussein Obama II(1961-08-04) August 4, 1961 (age 55)Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.|
|Spouse(s)||Michelle Robinson (m. 1992)|
|Relatives||See Family of Barack Obama|
|Awards||Nobel Peace Prize (2009)Profile in Courage Award (2017)|
Stop the exploitation of children
- Peter W.
- Saturday, 01 November 2014
Dear Mr President
I am not a psycholigist or anything, just a normal member of the public with a 10 year old and a 9 year old daughter and there are thing that I just cannot get my head round.
Firstly I do not know how true it is but a Lawyer (Avocate) has told me that it is legal in France and many countries around the world to view child (Paedo-Porn) on the internet providing that you do not download it, my question is why, whether you look at it then or download it to look at later is that not the same thing?
Secondly, Naturism websites, why are they allowed to show young children, mainly girls, completely nude exposing their genitels. Is this not a breeding ground for Paedophiles again. Last year I reported a website IMGS.ru which had a naturiste section and a blog below the photos and by the comments in the blog to me it seemed as though it was a Paedophile distribution ring andI believe that it was as it has now been closed down.
But thirdly and another of my big bugbears are the so called : Non Nude Preteen Modelling sites where scantilly clad children (again little girls aged from about 6 years of age to 14 years of age) pose in adult underware, Bras, thongs, etc. They are allowed to pose in very provocative positions but like with the naturiste websites it is okay as the children are not performing any sex act.. You can join these websites by credit card and get regular downloads of these child modela in sexy underware and in sexy poses. Why do people need to look at little children in these poses, it is not sexy so what is the motive to pay to look at the photos, it is utter filth, I just wonder what is the reason any "normal" human being wants to pay out regular money to look at these pictures, In my mind there is only one reason, they are just little children so again in my head it is just a breeding ground for Paedophiles and these paedophiles go on to commit more serious offences, child abduction, sexual abuse and even murder. Do our children not have the right to be safe.
Is there any way that Search engines can be made to stop locating these websites. I see that google has taken a step towards reducing it but people can switch to other web search engines like dogpile.com, etc. It is just completely disgusting and completely unaceptable.
Can all this stuff and I know it is a major task be stopped altogether, I have read in a resent article that to stop this filth would be an infringement of peoples civil rights and the rights of the models to express themselves. How can a five or six year old even know what that means.
Can governements get together and do something about it, there are all these summits all over the world, it is a major issue especially these days with all the sex trade trafficking and so many child refugees that it could be brough up as a major issue, do our children not deserve the right not to be abused or even murdered..
Any Ideas how normal people can be more actively involved.